Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Kazakh Sign Language (KSL) remains a low-resource language with limited parallel data for automatic translation. This study examines written Kazakh-to-KSL gloss translation with supervised models and preference-based optimization. A Transformer baseline and mBART-large-50 were trained on a parallel Kazakh–KSL corpus of 97,330 sentence pairs whose targets are derived from the source by rule-based reordering and tense-marker insertion. A reward model was trained on 79,215 automatically constructed preference pairs (corpus references as chosen, LLM-generated candidates as rejected) and a 27B-parameter Qwen3.6 policy adapted with low-rank adaptation (LoRA) was optimized with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). All systems were evaluated on a common test set of 8661 sentences disjoint from every training stage. PPO improved its own starting policy (sentence-level chrF 0.705 to 0.774; exact match 0.069 to 0.096), but the resulting policy remained below the supervised Transformer (BLEU 0.723) and mBART (sentence-level chrF 0.937; exact match 0.493). The reward model achieved 0.971 pairwise accuracy on the preference pairs (an in-sample estimate), but a classifier using surface features alone reached 0.984, and accuracy on pure word-order negatives was 0.635. These results show that, in this setting, held-out metrics largely reward reproduction of the source wording, which 24.3% of the references copy exactly, and that the reward signal largely reflects surface properties of the constructed pairs; we report a data-flow audit and shortcut analyses as a basis for future preference-based work on low-resource sign language translation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yerimbetova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: