Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The income elasticity of taxes is frequently used as an indicator of both short-run variability and long-run growth. This paper shows that the standard method for estimating elasticities results in asymptotic bias and inconsistent standard errors. Additionally, the standard estimates only provide information about the long-run growth potential of the tax. Thus, it is possible for a tax with a small estimated elasticity to fluctuate highly over the business cycle. This paper uses time-series econometric techniques to provide unbiased estimates of the long-run growth potential (the long-run elasticity) and cyclical variability (the short-run elasticity) of all major state tax bases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sobel et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: