Students’ interest in writing may shape how willingly they participate in and remain engaged with writing activities. This study examined whether fourth-grade students who experienced interactive writing reported different levels of interest in descriptive writing from students receiving conventional instruction. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design involved 76 students from elementary schools in Bone Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Thirty-seven students formed the experimental group and 39 the control group. Interest was measured using a ten-item Likert-type questionnaire covering enjoyment, attraction, attention, and involvement. The experimental group’s mean score changed descriptively from 31.35 (SD = 3.98) at pretest to 77.23 (SD = 13.77) at posttest, whereas the control group changed from 30.96 (SD = 4.35) to 69.04 (SD = 10.91). An independent-samples t-test showed higher posttest interest in the experimental group, t(74) = 2.883, p = .005, mean difference = 8.19, 95% CI [2.53, 13.85], with a moderate effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.66). These findings suggest that interactive writing was associated with an additional advantage in students’ interest in descriptive writing and underscore the value of attending to affective participation alongside writing development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sulkifli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: