Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mathematical reasoning enables elementary students to explain ideas, justify arguments, select strategies, and conclude. This study examined fourth-grade students’ mathematical reasoning after fraction instruction integrating an advanced organizer with open-ended tasks. A quantitative, pre-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design involved 206 students from two public elementary schools in Semarang, Indonesia. Instruction comprised four phases: preparation, Advance Organizer presentation, learning tasks, and cognitive reinforcement. Students completed a 10-item essay reasoning test before and after instruction and a 20-item response questionnaire afterward. Mean reasoning scores increased from 65.62 (SD = 18.95) to 75.17 (SD = 15.85), a 9.55-point gain (p < .001). The standardized mean change, calculated using pooled pretest–posttest standard deviations, was moderate (d_av = 0.547); the paired-difference standard deviation was unavailable. Seven reasoning indicators improved, whereas deductive, systematic, and consistent reasoning declined. Questionnaire responses averaged 89.08% of the maximum score (“very good”). These findings suggest preliminary within-group improvement but do not establish causality without a comparison group. The study offers a replicable sequence that activates and organizes prior knowledge before open-ended exploration, comparison, and justification in fraction learning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sulianto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: