Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chemistry learning requires learning materials that connect chemical concepts with authentic contexts while developing students’ higher-order thinking skills. This study aimed to develop digital learning material based on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics–Project-Based Learning (STEM-PjBL) integrated with Mandailing ethnoscience for acid–base solution learning and to determine its validity, practicality, and potential to support students’ critical thinking skills. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) design using the ADDIE model. The product was validated by three material experts and three media experts and tested with two lecturers and 30 Grade XI students at SMA Negeri 5 Medan using a one-group pretest–posttest design. Data were collected through validation sheets, practicality questionnaires, and critical-thinking tests. The results showed an overall validity of 98.58% and practicality of 98.91%. Students’ critical-thinking scores increased from 32 to 88, with an N-gain of 0.82, categorized as high. Analysis and inference showed the highest N-gain (1.00), while interpretation showed the lowest (0.67). The findings indicate that the developed digital learning material is highly feasible and practical and shows potential to support critical-thinking development. However, the observed gain cannot be interpreted as causal evidence because no comparison group was included.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sutiani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: