Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines how training and development (TD), perceived organizational support (POS), and AI collaboration (AIC) shape job performance (JP) among 226 Gen-Z property professionals in Indonesia, with employee engagement (EE) as a mediator. Grounded in Social Exchange Theory and the Job Demands-Resources model, the analysis using PLS-SEM reveals that EE fully mediates the effects of TD, POS, and AIC on JP no direct antecedent matters. The model explains 49.8% of variance in JP and 48.9% in EE. Importance-performance map analysis (IPMA) identifies EE as the highest-importance lever (0.571) yet AIC as the lowest-performing construct (76.5/100), flagging AI integration as a critical improvement gap. The study advances HRM by repositioning AI collaboration as an engagement-channeled job resource rather than a direct performance driver. For managers, the actionable playbook is engaging Gen-Z talent first, then leveraging AI tools to amplify performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darmawan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: