Key result
Gauteng residence is associated with the highest annual screening rates for chronic diseases and cancer.
Why the study?
Few data were available on national screening rates for chronic diseases of lifestyle, HIV, and cancer in South Africa and how these rates vary across provinces within a privately insured population.
Does provincial residence affect annual preventive screening rates for chronic diseases of lifestyle, cancers, and HIV in a privately insured South African population?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,889,447)
Does provincial residence affect annual preventive screening rates for chronic diseases of lifestyle, cancers, and HIV in a privately insured South African population?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Significant provincial disparities in preventive screening utilization exist across South Africa even among privately insured individuals with equal payment access, with better-resourced urban provinces achieving higher screening rates.
BACKGROUND: Screening for asymptomatic diseases can reduce the burden of morbidity and mortality in all population groups. There is widespread geographical variation in the quality of care. Few data are available on national screening rates in South Africa and how these vary across the provinces. OBJECTIVE: To examine screening rates for chronic diseases of lifestyle (CDL), HIV and cancer in a privately insured population for a single insurer across all nine provinces in South Africa, and to determine whether or not there are any differences between the provinces. METHOD: Screening rates were calculated as the proportion of eligible members who had received screening tests during 2011 in each province. Mean screening rates were compared between Gauteng and the other eight provinces. RESULTS: Nationwide screening rates were 20.5% for CDL, 8.2% for HIV and 31.9% for cancer. Despite similar insurance coverage, screening rates ranged from 0.3% to 0.95% lower in other provinces compared with Gauteng. Of all the provinces, Gauteng had the highestannual screening rates for CDL, breast cancer, prostate cancer and HIV (p < 0.001), while the Western Cape had the highest rate for cervical cancer (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is much variation in preventive care utilisation across the provinces within this health-insured population. Provinces with more abundant healthcare resources have higher screening rates. Further research is required to understand the reasons for the variation, given equal payment access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adonis et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Asymptomatic chronic diseases of lifestyle, cancers, and HIV (n=1,889,447). Provincial residential location in South Africa (eight provinces compared with Gauteng) vs. Residence in Gauteng province (baseline) was evaluated on Annual screening rates for chronic diseases of lifestyle (CDL), HIV, and cancer across provinces (p=<0.001). Provincial residence in Gauteng was associated with the highest annual screening rates for chronic diseases of lifestyle, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and HIV compared with other provinces.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: