Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Respiratory toxicity induced by pharmaceutical compounds is a major concern in drug discovery and development, emphasizing the need for reliable computational approaches to identify potentially hazardous compounds at an early stage. In this study, an artificial neural network (ANN) integrated with eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) was developed for the binary classification of pharmaceutical compounds as respiratory toxic or non-toxic using a tabular dataset of molecular descriptors. Model performance was evaluated through ten-fold cross-validation and external validation using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). During internal validation, the ANN achieved an accuracy of 84.05% and an AUC of 91.36%. On the external test set, the model yielded an accuracy of 83.40%, precision of 85.58%, recall of 85.19%, F1-score of 85.38%, MCC of 0.66, and AUC-ROC of 89.53%, demonstrating robust predictive performance and satisfactory generalization to unseen compounds. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was further employed to interpret the ANN predictions and identify the molecular characteristics most strongly associated with model output. The most influential descriptors included nBase, BCUTp-1h, SssO, minssCH2, JGI8, maxHBd, nHeteroRing, GATS2m, ETA_BetaP_ns_d, GATS1e. Collectively, these descriptors encode complementary information related to basicity, heterocyclic structure, local electronic environments, hydrogen-bonding characteristics, atomic polarizability, charge distribution, atomic mass, electronegativity, and molecular topology. The SHAP findings suggest that respiratory toxicity predictions are governed by the combined contribution of multiple structural and physicochemical characteristics rather than by a single molecular property.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MELEDJE et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: