Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of the article is to systematize theoretical approaches to the contribution of universities in the post-war recovery of border communities through SL methodology and to build, on this basis, a conceptual framework covering the organizational, personnel-competency, and comparative dimensions of the problem. Three mechanisms of SL's influence on the social capital of communities are identified. The specifics of implementing SL under conditions of constant security risk are analyzed. The role of SL in the digitalization of public services for communities is outlined, and groups of competencies required of specialists for recovery are formed. It is concluded that effective university participation in the post-war recovery of border territories requires a complex of organizational mechanisms, an expanded competency profile for specialists, and a adaptation of international SL experience to the Ukrainian context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivan Olyfirenko (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: