Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A Standard Operating Procedure for eCTD compilation, publishing, and submission is, for most product categories, a document-management and project-management artifact: it describes how source documents move from functional teams into Module 1 through Module 5, how quality control is performed, and how the final sequence is validated and transmitted. For an autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell program, this framing is necessary but not sufficient. An autologous CAR T product is manufactured from a specific patient's own T cells, collected by leukapheresis, genetically modified ex vivo, expanded, and returned to that same patient; the product literally cannot exist, and cannot be administered, independent of a single named individual (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2024a). An eCTD SOP for this category must therefore be built around a requirement that barely registers in a conventional small-molecule SOP: maintaining an unbroken, verifiable chain of identity (COI) linking a specific patient to a specific manufacturing batch, from collection through infusion, with the regulatory documentation of that chain forming a genuinely distinct content stream within the submission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peivand Pirouzi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: