Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nabire Port is the main logistics node of Central Papua Province, yet its service performance has rarely been examined from a queueing perspective using operational data recorded at the level of individual arrivals. This study analyses ship services and freight-forwarding truck services at Nabire Port as two separately observed subsystems and combines their subsystem-level results into a constructed logistics-time indicator, not a verified tandem queue. The novelty of the study lies in its empirical comparison of classical queueing benchmarks with observed timestamps in a multi-cargo regional port, together with an explicit assessment of when those benchmarks are and are not applicable. Primary data comprising 60 ship arrivals (July-September 2026) and 60 forwarding-truck arrivals (July 2026) were analysed using M/M/1 and M/M/c models. Distributional assumptions were tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and theoretical results were compared with observed waiting times and, for the single-server case, the Kingman approximation. The ship system was stable, with a utilisation of 0.391, a theoretical waiting time of 9.15 hours, and a time in system of 23.40 hours, whereas the observed mean waiting time was 1.33 hours. The single-server truck model gave a utilisation of 0.907 and a theoretical waiting time of 26.34 hours, far above the observed mean of 0.49 hours, because up to three trucks were served simultaneously. In the M/M/c scenario with two service channels, the theoretical truck waiting time fell to 0.70 hours and the combined ship-truck indicator to 26.81 hours, compared with 52.45 hours with one channel. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests rejected the exponential assumptions for all inter-arrival and service times; therefore, the M/M results are interpreted as theoretical baselines and model-based scenario indications, not as validated predictions or as an economically optimal capacity, since no cost data were analysed
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agung Nugroho (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: