Key result
Prior CABG linked to ~40% lower procedural success in patients undergoing CTO-PCI.
Why the study?
Prior CABG is associated with accelerated native vessel atherosclerosis and more complex CTO anatomy, making CTO-PCI more challenging despite contemporary technical advances. This study compared CTO lesion characteristics, procedural demands, and in-hospital outcomes according to prior CABG status.
Does prior CABG impact CTO lesion complexity, procedural success, and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing CTO-PCI?
Meta-Analysis (n=47,434)
Yes
Does prior CABG impact CTO lesion complexity, procedural success, and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing CTO-PCI?
Prior CABG is associated with substantially greater CTO lesion complexity, lower procedural success, and higher in-hospital complication risks during CTO-PCI, highlighting the need for careful procedural planning and risk stratification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports rigorous pre-procedural risk stratification for post-CABG CTO-PCI; leaves open whether specialized crossing strategies can mitigate these excess complication risks.
Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with accelerated native vessel atherosclerosis and more complex chronic total occlusion (CTO) anatomy, rendering CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) more challenging despite contemporary technical advances. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CTO lesion characteristics, procedural demands, and in-hospital outcomes according to prior CABG status. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were systematically searched from inception through May 15, 2026, for studies comparing CTO-PCI outcomes in patients with and without prior CABG. Data were pooled using odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs). Twelve studies enrolling 47,434 patients, including 10,354 with prior CABG, were included. Compared with patients without prior CABG, those with prior CABG had higher rates of blunt stump morphology (OR 1.51 [1.42–1.61]), proximal cap ambiguity (OR 1.55 [1.45–1.66]), calcification (OR 2.49 [2.22–2.79]), vessel bending (OR 2.27 [1.27–4.05]), distal cap bifurcation (OR 1.73 [1.51–1.98]), and higher Multicenter CTO Registry of Japan scores (SMD 0.48 [0.40–0.56]). Procedural burden was greater, with higher contrast use, longer fluoroscopy time and procedure duration, and greater stent use. Technical success (OR 0.63 [0.43–0.92]) and procedural success (OR 0.60 [0.53–0.69]) were lower in the prior CABG group. In-hospital mortality (OR 2.19), myocardial infarction (OR 2.29), and contrast-induced nephropathy (OR 1.97) were higher, whereas cardiac tamponade was less frequent (OR 0.37). Prior CABG is associated with substantially greater CTO complexity, procedural burden, and in-hospital risk, underscoring the need for careful procedural planning and individualized risk stratification in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azam et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic total occlusion undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) (n=47,434). Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. No prior CABG was evaluated on Procedural success (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.53-0.69). Prior CABG in CTO-PCI was associated with lower procedural success (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.53-0.69), lower technical success (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.92), and higher in-hospital mortality (OR 2.19).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: