Key result
Hand reflexology is linked to a ~1-mmHg within-group reduction in systolic blood pressure.
Why the study?
The hemodynamic changes and anxiety-related outcomes following hand reflexology in patients with acute myocardial infarction were examined.
Does hand reflexology improve hemodynamic parameters and reduce anxiety in hospitalized patients with acute myocardial infarction compared to usual care?
RCT (n=88)
Parallel-group using sealed envelopes containing color codes
No
Does hand reflexology improve hemodynamic parameters and reduce anxiety in hospitalized patients with acute myocardial infarction compared to usual care?
Although within-group hemodynamic changes were observed after hand reflexology in patients with acute myocardial infarction, the lack of between-group statistical comparisons and unresolved anxiety scoring inconsistencies prevent establishing clinical efficacy over usual care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hand reflexology lacks demonstrated superiority to usual care in acute MI; leaves open its hemodynamic effects pending between-group data.
Objective: This study examined hemodynamic changes and anxiety-related outcomes following hand reflexology among patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Materials: A parallel-group randomized trial was conducted at Al-Diwaniya Teaching Hospital, Iraq. Of 104 patients assessed, 88 were allocated to hand reflexology (n = 47) or usual care (n = 41). Reflexology comprised 15-minute sessions on three consecutive days. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and anxiety-related scores were assessed before and after intervention. Within-group differences were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and paired t tests. Findings: In the reflexology group, systolic blood pressure decreased from 134.91 to 133.49 mmHg (p = .045), diastolic pressure from 81.92 to 80.79 mmHg (p = .010), and heart rate from 78.34 to 71.75 beats/min (p = .003). Oxygen saturation increased from 95.77% to 96.48% (p = .041). Corresponding within-group changes in controls were nonsignificant (all p > .05). Anxiety-related scores increased from 2.5552 to 2.6371 in the intervention group (reported p = .024), although scoring direction was unclear. No between-group treatment-effect estimates were reported. Conclusion: Hand reflexology was associated with within-group hemodynamic changes, but comparative efficacy and anxiety reduction remain unestablished. Verified scoring and direct between-group analyses are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammad et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute myocardial infarction (n=88). Hand reflexology vs. Usual care was evaluated on Post-intervention systolic blood pressure (mmHg) (p=0.045 (within-group reflexology); 0.285 (within-group control)). Hand reflexology was associated with within-group decreases in systolic blood pressure (134.91 to 133.49 mmHg, p=0.045) and heart rate (78.34 to 71.75 bpm, p=0.003), without between-group comparisons.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: