Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: To evaluate antimicrobial resistance, microbiome/resistome changes and clinical safety during event-driven doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP), distinguishing clinical outcomes from laboratory surrogates.Methods: PubMed, Europe PMC and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on 11 October 2026. Primary human studies were eligible; companion publications were linked to study families. Outcome-specific appraisal used RoB 2, ROBINS-I or design-appropriate JBI tools, followed by GRADE. A single review workflow was used. Synthesis followed SWiM because analysis units, phenotypes, follow-up and exposure contrasts were incompatible with pooling. Results: After deduplication, 496 database records yielded 55 retained reports; three registry results brought the evidence map to 58 reports in 37 study families. Twenty-one reports from 11 families contributed target-outcome information. High-level gonococcal tetracycline-resistance signals arose in DOXYVAC and three observational settings, with very low certainty of causal effects. These culture-conditioned results do not estimate absolute resistant-infection incidence. One selected DoxyPEP substudy showed tetracycline-resistome enrichment. In IPERGAY, gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in 62/116 versus 47/116 participants (risk ratio 1.32, 95% CI 0.999–1.74; low certainty). King County reported greater resistant S. aureus and group A streptococcal carriage in exposed screening visits, with very low certainty. DOXYVAC documented one drug-related serious fixed drug eruption. Serious-event and laboratory data did not establish comparative safety equivalence. Conclusions: Doxy-PEP has documented intolerance and organism-specific resistance signals. The magnitude of any increase in absolute resistant-infection risk remains uncertain. Clinical interpretation and surveillance should preserve distinctions between patients, sampled organisms, molecular markers and exposure periods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rara Septipriskila Vira, Ketut Kwartantaya Winaya, Nyoman Yudha Santosa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: