Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study compared the areas demarcated by a T1-enhancing agent, Gd-DTPA-BMA, and a magnetic susceptibility agent, Dy-DTPA-BMA, with 201thallium autoradiography (indicator of perfusion) and postmortem histochemical staining with triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC)(indicator of infarction). METHODS: Thirteen rats were subjected to coronary artery occlusion for 3 to 4 hours before acquisition of four sets of electrocardiogram-gated spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) images: T1-weighted images before and after 0.2 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA-BMA; and T2-weighted images before and after 0.3 mmol/kg Dy-DTPA-BMA. After MR imaging, intravenous 201thallium delineated the area of decreased myocardial perfusion. At autopsy, TTC staining delineated the area of myocardial infarction. RESULTS: A myocardial region in the distribution of the occluded artery was delinated as a hyperintense area ("hot-spot") by Dy-DTPA-BMA and as a hypointense area ("cold-spot") by Gd-DTPA-BMA. The hyperintense area demarcated by Dy-DTPA-BMA (51 +/- 3% of the area of the midequitorial slice of the left ventricle) showed a closer relationship to the area of decreased myocardial perfusion (jeopardized area) (46 +/- 3%), determined by 201thallium autoradiography, than the area of myocardial infarction (36 +/- 4%), determined by histochemical staining. However, the hypointense area demarcated by Gd-DTPA-BMA (29 +/- 2%) did not relate as closely to the area of decreased myocardial perfusion (slope = 0.54) or the area of myocardial infarction (r = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: The abnormal myocardial area delineated by the magnetic susceptibility agent showed a closer relationship to the area of deficient myocardial perfusion (jeopardy area) after coronary occlusion than that defined by T1-enhancing contrast media.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: