Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Agricultural irrigation systems can bear the heavy losses of water through runoff, evaporation, and deep percolation. Crop water requirements vary with crop species, growth stage, soil properties, evapotranspiration, weather, and plant water status; therefore, irrigation scheduling based on a single parameter is insufficient. Conventional water management systems often rely on uniform application, fixed scheduling, and limited real-time information, which overlooks spatial and temporal variation in soil, crop, and weather conditions and can result in water loss, over-irrigation, and under-irrigation. This review highlights studies on the integration of AI-driven sensing and imaging technologies, IoT-based precision irrigation, variable-rate technologies, digital twins, and agricultural robotics for crop water management. These approaches integrate field, crop, weather, and spatial information to support water-demand assessment, crop-stress monitoring, irrigation scheduling, site-specific application, and automated water management. The reviewed studies report water savings, improved water-use efficiency, crop performance, and more site-specific irrigation and input application across different crops and irrigation systems. The review also highlights the limitations of these systems, including sensing reliability, model transferability, connectivity, interoperability, cybersecurity, investment costs, and environmental effects. Overall, the integration of these technologies provides potential for timely and field-specific irrigation decisions and supports efficient and climate-resilient water management in agriculture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghanghas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: