Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines how value congruity relates to modest fashion purchase decisions alongside religiosity, electronic word-of-mouth (e-WOM), Islamic moral identity, and attitude. Research Methods: A cross-sectional online survey in Banten, Indonesia, yielded 101 eligible cases from 206 responses collected from July 31 to September 11, 2026. Participants were aged 17–25, and 99.0% were students. Associations were estimated through path analysis of unit-weighted composite scores with 5,000 paired bootstrap resamples. Results: Religiosity was associated with Islamic moral identity (β = .814), while value congruity was associated with attitude (β = .763) and purchase-decision scores (β = .639); all three p values were below .001. The equations accounted for 66.3%, 76.2%, and 82.2% of the respective in-sample score variance. Other direct paths, interactions, and exploratory indirect effects were not significant. However, CON–KEP HTMT was .920, and shared-method diagnostics raised concerns. Conclusion: Value congruity warrants further investigation, but measurement overlap, the student-dominated sample, and the cross-sectional design prevent a definitive claim that it is a distinct causal driver. The results support further testing of value-aligned communication rather than claims about verified purchasing behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suryani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: