Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Re-runs papers #449 and #479's conjunction checks with their no-web fence lifted for two records the house index itself harvested into L7, both read whole from filed texts: arXiv:1708.08630v4 (Cuffaro) and arXiv:2512.18105v1 (Barandes, Hasan & Kagan). Gated first on both parent notebooks re-run whole, digit-for-digit (PR box S=4; isotropic band (2.828, 3.266]; fences 2 / 2.828427 / 4; gap 0.438). Verdict: the almost-quantum witness SURVIVES contact. Cuffaro motivates information causality (Einstein being-thus generalised to communication) but does not derive it, so #449's K3 stands unmet; his Sec. 4 reports the almost-quantum result as 'numerical evidence' in his own words -- the set is named only in his reference list -- so #479's survivor form (ii) still lacks its theorem. The 2512.18105 claimant enters through form (i), a principle outside #165's census: causal locality proves the CHSH-game bound (score <= 1/sqrt(2), win <= 0.853553, recomputed from its Eq. (8)) for causally local unistochastic processes, but states no exact-Q characterisation in all scenarios and never names the almost-quantum set (zero mentions). EXTENSION at its ceiling. Quantum gravity NOT SOLVED; vacuum catastrophe NOT SOLVED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: