Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To assess whether longitudinally measured systemic high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels are associated with time to progression to any advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or AMD phenotypes in a cohort of subjects with intermediate AMD (iAMD). Methods: Medical records were obtained from subjects in the University of Colorado AMD Registry (enrolled 2014–2023) with at least 1 month of follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) from joint models estimating the association between longitudinally measured systemic high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and time to progression to advanced AMD. Results: A total of 428 subjects with iAMD were enrolled. During the 1828 person-years of follow-up, 18% of subjects showed progression to geographic atrophy (GA), and 14% had progression to neovascular AMD. Analyzed as a continuous variable, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (mg/L) were not associated with time to progression to any advanced AMD (HR, 1.13, 95% credible interval [95% CrI], 0.57 to 2.23; P = .71), time to progression to GA (HR, 1.21, 95% CrI, 0.44 to 3.27; P = .71), or time to progression to neovascular AMD (HR, 1.03, 95% CrI, 0.43 to 2.50; P = .95). Examined as a dichotomous variable by decile, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was not associated with progression to any advanced AMD for any dichotomization threshold assessed. Conclusions: The findings suggest that longitudinally measured systemic high-sensitivity C-reactive protein is not a useful biomarker for the timing of progression from iAMD to advanced AMD phenotypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grove et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: