Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ground bearing capacity and localized deformation beneath shallow foundations remain important problems in geotechnical engineering. This study examines a rigid rectangular footing (70 mm × 50 mm) on dry, uniformly graded sand (d50 = 3.0 mm; Cu = 1.3; Cc = 1.0) using a laboratory model test, DIC-assisted imaging, and DEM simulations with single-sphere and four-sphere clumped particles. The selected experimental bearing pressure was 561.00 kPa at 20.62 mm settlement, based on the maximum-curvature criterion, equivalent to 29.5% of the 70-mm footing dimension. Visible deformation zones were estimated to orient at 44.33° and 48.80° on the left and right; these are approximate image-based directions, not theoretical slip-surface angles. The DEM simulations gave ultimate pressures of 445.57 kPa (single sphere) and 527.87 kPa (clump), 20.58% and 5.91% below the experimental value, respectively. Since the two DEM representations were calibrated separately and used different material/contact parameters, the closer clump-model agreement cannot be attributed to particle shape alone and is not an independent validation. The results are model-scale observations affected by the container boundaries and should not be directly extrapolated to full-scale design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: