Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Chronic conditions are associated with poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and are more common in socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. We examined income-related inequality in health-related quality of life and quantified the contribution of chronic conditions to inequality in HRQoL among Australian adults. Methods: We analysed pooled cross-sectional survey data from 4953 Australian adults recruited through a non-probability online panel. We measured HRQoL using EQ-5D-5L utility scores calculated with the Australian value set. We measured income-related inequality using the Erreygers-corrected concentration index. Multivariable ordinary least squares regression estimated adjusted associations with utility, and decomposition analysis estimated the statistical contributions of chronic-condition burden and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Higher EQ-5D-5L utility was modestly concentrated among participants in higher-income categories (Erreygers-corrected concentration index [ECI] = 0.0328; bootstrap SE = 0.0038; 95% bootstrap percentile CI 0.0251–0.0401; p < 0.001). Compared with participants reporting no chronic condition, those with multimorbidity had an adjusted utility score that was 0.151 points lower. Multimorbidity made the largest contribution to the observed inequality (27.63%), followed by not working (26.34%) and annual income above A$65,000 (19.27%). Conclusions: EQ-5D-5L utility was modestly concentrated among participants in higher-income categories. Multimorbidity and not working were the largest measured contributors. These cross-sectional findings describe statistical associations and do not establish cause and effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keramat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: