Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study (non-induced) subgraph counting under interactive local edge differential privacy (LEDP). Given a fixed pattern graph H with k vertices, ≥1 edges, and q connected components, our goal is to approximately count its copies in an arbitrary n-vertex undirected graph while preserving edge privacy. We give two complementary accuracy guarantees. First, for every H, we give Linear Noise Cancellation (LNC), a two-round ε-LEDP algorithm with additive error and root mean square error both O(nk-3/2/ε⁾ on every n-vertex graph. For fixed sufficiently small ε, this improves the optimal noninteractive additive error for triangles by a factor of √ n and gives the same improvement in worst-case root mean square error for all cliques on at least three vertices. To our knowledge, this is the first separation between interactive and noninteractive LEDP subgraph counting, showing that a single additional round can improve worst-case accuracy polynomially. Second, we determine how accuracy improves when the graph has maximum degree at most a public bound d. Our Predict and Correct (PC) framework gives an (+2)-round ε-LEDP algorithm with additive error O(nq-1/2dk-q-1log³⁻²n/ε⁾. For connected patterns, its polynomial factor is √ n\,dᵏ⁻², giving sublinear error on constant-degree graphs at fixed privacy. We prove matching lower bounds in n and d, up to logarithmic factors at fixed privacy, even under arbitrary interaction and approximate privacy with sufficiently small $δ$. At $d=Θ(n)$, the lower bound also establishes the optimality of LNC's dependence on n.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: