Key result
Higher Osaka Prognostic Score links to ~2.6-fold higher two-year mortality per point in HFrEF.
Why the study?
Although the inflammation- and nutrition-based Osaka Prognostic Score (OPS) has shown prognostic value in several cardiovascular conditions, its significance for predicting mortality in patients with HFrEF remained unclear.
Does the baseline Osaka Prognostic Score predict two-year all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)?
Cohort (n=198)
No
Does the baseline Osaka Prognostic Score predict two-year all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Osaka Prognostic Score, an easily calculated index of C-reactive protein, serum albumin, and lymphocyte count, independently predicts two-year all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF with good discriminative ability (AUC 0.824).
Background Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, highlighting the need for simple and reliable prognostic tools. The Osaka Prognostic Score (OPS), an inflammation- and nutrition-based score incorporating C-reactive protein (CRP), serum albumin, and lymphocyte count, has demonstrated prognostic value in several cardiovascular conditions. However, its significance in patients with HFrEF remains unclear. This study investigated the association between OPS and two-year all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. Methods This retrospective single-center study included 198 patients with HFrEF. OPS was calculated using serum CRP, albumin, and total lymphocyte count obtained at baseline. The primary outcome was two-year all-cause mortality. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Independent predictors of mortality were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and DeLong testing were performed to compare the predictive performance of OPS and its individual components. Results During the two-year follow-up, 42 patients (21.2%) died. Non-survivors had significantly higher OPS values than survivors (2 [1–2] vs. 0 [0–1], p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated progressively reduced survival across increasing OPS categories (log-rank p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, diabetes mellitus (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.67, 95% CI 1.28–5.57; p = 0.009) and OPS (aHR 2.63, 95% CI 1.86–3.73; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of two-year mortality. ROC analysis showed that OPS had the highest discriminative ability for mortality prediction (AUC 0.824), outperforming lymphocyte count ( p = 0.005) and demonstrating comparable performance to CRP and albumin ( p = 0.828 and p = 0.057). Conclusion OPS was independently associated with two-year mortality and demonstrated good prognostic performance in patients with HFrEF. As a readily available score integrating inflammatory, nutritional, and immunological parameters, OPS may represent a useful prognostic marker in this population. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aladağ et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=198). Osaka Prognostic Score (OPS, per 1-point increase) vs. Lower Osaka Prognostic Score was evaluated on Two-year all-cause mortality (aHR 2.63, 95% CI 1.86-3.73, p=<0.001). Higher Osaka Prognostic Score independently predicted two-year all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF (aHR 2.63 per 1-point increase, 95% CI 1.86–3.73; p < 0.001; AUC 0.824).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: