Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article raises a number of relevant theoretical and practical issues that arise in connection with the use of artificial intelligence in forensic expert activities, as well as in the process of forming and evaluating evidence in criminal cases in the context of digitalization. The article substantiates a number of conclusions regarding the use of artificial intelligence technologies and systems, based on their auxiliary role in the work of experts and specialists. This approach can already improve the efficiency of research activities by optimizing the processing of large amounts of information in computer-technical, economic, and other types of forensic examinations. The risks of using artifi cial intelligence technologies and systems were analyzed at the stage of preparing an expert opinion, as well as during the evaluation of data obtained during forensic examinations. A number of systemic proposals have been formulated to streamline the principles and rules for applying technologies and systems of artificial intelligence that use large generative models, taking into account the limitations imposed by the specific nature of the expert’s cognitive activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Николаевич et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: