Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Microphone-array direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimators must cope with changes in array layout, sensor availability, and the number of active sources. We present GCPR-DOA, a geometry-conditioned pair representation that encodes each cross-spectral pair together with its microphone baseline and frequency before masked aggregation, so that one network processes arrays with 4 to 32 microphones. Two decoders use this representation: a set decoder supervised through analytic positive-semidefinite covariance reconstruction, and a spectral-moment decoder that forms a geometry-weighted steered coherence spectrum and counts sources from energy-aware features. On the LOCATA corpus, paired three-seed ablations show that geometry conditioning lowers the optimal subpattern assignment (OSPA) error by 1.35 degrees and the fixed-output angular error by 9.7 degrees. Trained on the same queries as an adapted SRP-DNN and evaluated on 46,457 common queries, the spectral-moment decoder reaches median single-source errors of 5.5–5.8 degrees, compared with 8.8–9.0 degrees, and higher active-query F1 (0.51–0.54 versus 0.47–0.49); on the three arrays other than DICIT, the two methods are comparable (5.7–5.8 versus 6.3 degrees). On the original 33,497-frame evaluation, localized F1 at ten degrees rises from 0.137 to 0.568–0.597, above all classical references.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: