Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
研究领域:制度经济学、演化博弈论、社会治理、中国哲学现代转译 Research Fields: Institutional Economics, Evolutionary Game Theory, Social Governance, Modern Reinterpretation of Chinese Philosophy 作者:郭洋洋Author: Guo YangyangORCID:0009-0006-6669-1790Contact email:gyy-goes@foxmail.comPublication Type: PreprintSubmission Date: November 5, 2026Version: v1.0 Bilingual EditionPreprint DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23975941Open Access License: CC BY 4.0 摘要 Abstract 原生社会系统长期存在“守底线主体生存概率系统性低于无底线主体”的演化偏差,传统解决方案依赖道德教化与牺牲型道义实践,普遍存在可持续性不足、易被叙事套利、反噬本地秩序等缺陷。本文构建底线共生范式,以对等主体为伦理底座,完成杨朱边界思想与墨家普惠实践的现代性合流;以商业化普惠为执行载体,替代传统单向投喂式慈善;以同类识别为种群筛选阀门,定向放大守底群体的存续优势;以微增量、低扰动为干预原则,依靠市场自发扩散实现全域底线抬升。研究表明,该范式可在长周期稳态博弈中系统性反转守底线主体的生存概率劣势,形成“主体对等、边界清晰、内生循环、持续演化”的底线共生秩序,为全球减贫、区域援助与社会治理提供非道德化的可落地框架。 There exists a long-standing evolutionary bias in native social systems: the survival probability of bound-constrained agents is systematically lower than that of unbound agents. Traditional solutions rely on moral enlightenment and sacrificial moral practice, which generally suffer from insufficient sustainability, vulnerability to narrative arbitrage, and destructive effects on local order. This paper constructs the paradigm of bottom-line symbiosis. Based on the ethical foundation of equal subjects, it realizes the modern convergence of Yang Zhu’s boundary thought and Mohist inclusive practice; it takes commercial inclusiveness as the implementation carrier to replace traditional one-way charitable handouts; it adopts peer identification as the population screening valve to directionally amplify the survival advantage of bottom-line-abiding groups; it follows the intervention principle of micro-increment and low disturbance, and realizes the elevation of the overall bottom line through spontaneous market diffusion. The study shows that this paradigm can systematically reverse the survival probability disadvantage of bound-constrained agents in long-term steady-state games, and form a bottom-line symbiotic order featuring "equal subjects, clear boundaries, endogenous circulation, and continuous evolution". It provides a non-moralized and practical framework for global poverty reduction, regional assistance and social governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
洋洋 郭 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: