Key result
Extreme preterm birth is not associated with differences in childhood LVEDVI compared with term birth.
Why the study?
This study aimed to compare childhood cardiac morphology and function between children born extremely preterm and those born at term.
Does extreme prematurity result in altered cardiac morphology and function (specifically LVEDVI on cardiac MRI) in childhood (aged 7-12 years) compared to term birth?
Cross-Sectional (n=65)
Blinded image analysts
No
Does extreme prematurity result in altered cardiac morphology and function (specifically LVEDVI on cardiac MRI) in childhood (aged 7-12 years) compared to term birth?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the first cardiac MRI study of young and pre-adolescent children born extremely preterm, no statistically significant differences in indexed cardiac structure or function were found compared to term-born peers, although the study was underpowered to detect small-to-moderate differences.
Objective Compare cardiac morphology and function in childhood between children born extremely preterm and those born at term. Design Cross-sectional study of participants from previously established neonatal cohorts. Participants Ex-preterm and term born control children aged 7–12 years who were participants in studies of nutritional interventions and body composition in the neonatal period. Interventions Free-breathing, non-sedated cardiac MRI. Main outcome measures Cardiac morphology and function including ventricular indexed end-diastolic volume, ventricular indexed myocardial mass, ventricular stroke volumes and ventricular ejection fractions. Results 33 ex-preterm and 32 term-born children were included. The median (IQR) age was 10 (9–10) years. The mean (SD) gestational age of the preterm babies was 28.5 (2.2) weeks and mean (SD) birth weight was 1205 (338 g). No statistically significant differences were detected in any outcomes; however, the direction and magnitude of differences across most cardiac parameters were consistent with being smaller in the preterm group. Conclusions Contrary to published literature, we found no statistically significant differences in cardiac structure and function in young and pre-adolescent children born extremely preterm compared with those born at term. The small sample size precludes drawing firm conclusions. Further studies are needed to understand the progression of cardiac changes through adolescence and into adulthood and potential interventions to prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes in this vulnerable population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirolos et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Prematurity and cardiac remodelling in childhood (n=65). Extreme preterm birth vs. Term birth was evaluated on Left ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area (LVEDVI, mL/m2) (p=0.73). Extreme preterm birth was not associated with statistically significant differences in childhood indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume compared with term birth (60.3 vs 61.2 mL/m2, p=0.73).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: