Key result
SGLT2 inhibitors confer ~2.3-fold higher ketoacidosis risk in diabetes, though net clinical benefits remain favorable.
Why the study?
Concerns about ketoacidosis have led to routine preoperative discontinuation of SGLT2 inhibitors, yet whether this risk is outweighed by perioperative mortality and renal benefits remained unquantified, and differences in ketoacidosis risk by diabetes status necessitated stratified analysis.
Does SGLT2 inhibitor therapy increase ketoacidosis risk relative to its perioperative mortality and renal benefits in diabetic and non-diabetic patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=102,077)
Does SGLT2 inhibitor therapy increase ketoacidosis risk relative to its perioperative mortality and renal benefits in diabetic and non-diabetic patients?
SGLT2 inhibitors confer a rare ketoacidosis risk in diabetic patients (NNH ~775) and negligible risk in non-diabetics that is substantially outweighed by perioperative mortality and AKI benefits, supporting risk-stratified perioperative management over routine blanket discontinuation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports perioperative SGLT2 inhibitor continuation in diabetics; confirms net mortality and AKI benefit outweighing ketoacidosis risk in RCT meta-analysis.
Background: SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are guideline-directed therapies for T2D, HF, and CKD. Concerns about ketoacidosis (KA) — particularly euglycemic KA (EKA) — have led to routine preoperative discontinuation. Whether KA risk is outweighed by perioperative mortality and renal benefits remains unquantified. Major HF/CKD trials enrolled substantial non-diabetic populations (DAPA-HF 58%, EMPEROR-Reduced ~50%, DELIVER ~50%, EMPA-KIDNEY 54%, DAPA-CKD 33%), and KA risk differs fundamentally by diabetes status, necessitating stratified analysis. Methods: We pooled 22 SGLT2i RCTs (N=102,077; 55,024 SGLT2i vs. 47,053 placebo; ~72,000 diabetic, ~30,000 non-diabetic). The primary outcome was pooled OR for KA in diabetic participants, with prespecified secondary analysis in non-diabetic participants. Subgroup analyses by indication (ASCVD, CKD, HF, glycemic control) were performed. Perioperative mortality and AKI data from two large propensity-matched registry studies were integrated to calculate NNH and NNT, enabling net clinical benefit assessment. Sensitivity analyses modeled underreported EKA (2х / 3х correction factors). Results: Among diabetic participants, 93 vs. 22 KA events occurred (SGLT2i vs. placebo; OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.55-3.33; I 2 =0%), aligning with the Staplin et al. IPD meta-analysis (HR 2.29; 1.42-3.71). Subgroup ORs — ASCVD 2.43 (1.50-3.92), CKD 2.89 (1.38-6.05), HF 2.14 (0.62-7.38) showed no significant heterogeneity (p=0.82), consistent with a class effect. Among ~30,000 non-diabetic participants, only 1 KA event occurred, precluding meaningful risk estimation consistent with KDIGO 2024 guidance stating no excess KA risk without diabetes. Integration with perioperative registry data yielded: KA NNH ~775; 30-day mortality NNT ~72-100 (OR 0.61-0.70); AKI NNT ~36-50 (OR 0.69-0.71). For every 1 additional KA event, approximately 8-11 deaths are prevented and 15-22 AKI events avoided. The VA registry study (JAMA Surgery 2025) found SGLT2i users had increased postoperative EKA (OR 1.11; 1.05-1.17) but reduced mortality (OR 0.70; 0.55-0.88) and AKI (OR 0.69; 0.62-0.78). Up to 58% of SGLT2i-associated KA presents euglycemically, likely underestimated in RCT safety reporting. Sensitivity analyses doubling/tripling KA counts (NNH ~400/~270) preserved a strongly favorable net benefit. Conclusions: SGLT2i confer a rare, manageable KA risk increase in diabetic patients (OR ~2.3, NNH ~775) substantially outweighed by perioperative mortality and renal benefits. In non-diabetic patients, KA risk is negligible, making net benefit even more favorable. These findings support risk-stratified perioperative SGLT2i management rather than blanket discontinuation, with EKA prevention protocols — including point-of-care ketone testing and IV dextrose as recommended by the SPAQI 2026 consensus statement — for diabetic patients undergoing prolonged fasting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roy et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (n=102,077). SGLT2 inhibitors vs. Placebo was evaluated on Ketoacidosis (KA) in diabetic participants (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.55-3.33). SGLT2 inhibitors increased ketoacidosis in diabetic patients (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.55-3.33; NNH ~775), which was outweighed by perioperative mortality (NNT ~72-100) and AKI (NNT ~36-50) benefits.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: