Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper compares three SiC–based three-phase AC–DC power converter topologies for modular high-power electric vehicle (EV) charging applications: (i) Bidirectional two-level full-bridge; (ii) Unidirectional three-level Vienna rectifier; and (iii) Bidirectional three-level t-type converter. The study targets module-level operation in high-power modular EV chargers and mainly focuses on analyzing the grid-side power quality, quantified by total harmonic distortion (THD) and ripple of the current. This comparison makes use of a deadbeat predictive current controller, implemented as a continuous-control-set model predictive control (CCS-MPC) scheme, common to the three topologies. Simulations are carried out with up to six 100 kW AC-DC modules in parallel, both without phase shift and with a carrier phase shift of 360°/ n between AC-DC modules. The results show that the inclusion of phase shift significantly reduces the grid-side current THD in the full-bridge and t-type power converters, which makes it practically independent of the number of AC-DC modules, whereas the Vienna rectifier maintains significantly higher THD values due to the uncontrollable region associated with the diodes. Finally, experimental results are obtained using a 25 kW reduced scale prototype common to the three studied topologies, considering the operation of a single AC-DC converter module and evaluating grid-side power quality under identical operating conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: