Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction This study examines the implications of Nigeria's 2025 Value Added Tax (VAT) revenue-sharing reform under the Tinubu administration for fiscal federalism, economic equity, and subnational development. The revised formula increases the weight of the derivation principle, directing a greater share of VAT proceeds to states with stronger consumption bases and revenue-generating capacity. Methods The study employed a qualitative research design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 stakeholders from federal institutions, state governments, academia, the private sector, and civil society across Nigeria's six geopolitical zones. Relevant policy documents were also analyzed. Results and discussion Three main patterns emerged. First, approximately four-fifths of respondents viewed the new formula as favouring economically advanced states particularly Lagos, Rivers, and the Federal Capital Territory while limiting the fiscal space of less-developed states. Second, respondents associated the reform with improved tax compliance and revenue effort in high-consumption states, but questioned whether states with weaker structural capacity could respond to these incentives. Third, participants warned that the reform could deepen existing regional development disparities without robust equalisation transfers and targeted capacity-building. Overall, the findings suggest that the reform may improve efficiency and accountability in revenue generation, but also poses risks to fiscal equity and national cohesion unless supported by effective redistributive safeguards. The study contributes evidence-based perspectives to the literature on fiscal decentralization and Nigeria's evolving VAT system, particularly on the challenge of balancing efficiency, equity, and subnational development within a federal framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ekekwe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: