Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This study, guided by the cognitive theory of multimedia learning (CTML), investigates how multimodal large language models (MLLMs) mediate the professional learning of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) pre-service teachers within Chinese lesson study (CLS). It aims to elucidate the cognitive and dialogic mechanisms through which AI-supported mediation shapes teacher learning processes and participation. Design/methodology/approach A three-month intervention integrating MLLMs into CLS was conducted with 50 EFL pre-service teachers at a Chinese normal university. Adopting an interpretive qualitative design, data were collected from longitudinal reflective journals, MLLM interaction logs, field notes and two rounds of semi-structured interviews with 5 purposively selected focal participants. Data analysis combined deductive coding based on CTML (intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load) with inductive thematic analysis to capture emergent patterns of AI-mediated learning and interaction. Findings The findings reveal that MLLMs functioned as cognitive-dialogic mediators in three key ways: (1) reducing linguistic and organizational barriers, thereby lowering extraneous cognitive load; (2) redistributing cognitive resources to support meaning-making and pedagogical reasoning; and (3) enabling deeper engagement in collaborative knowledge construction and reflective inquiry within CLS. However, participants also reported tensions related to epistemic reliability and the risk of overreliance on AI-generated outputs, indicating a shift in cognitive demands from knowledge construction to evaluation and regulation. Originality/value This study advances the field by proposing a cognitive-dialogic framework that brings CTML into dialog with sociocultural perspectives on mediation, offering a nuanced account of how AI reshapes teacher learning in practice-based settings. It contributes empirical evidence on the role of MLLMs as mediating tools in CLS and provides design implications for cognitively and ethically informed AI integration in teacher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xing et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: