Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines the linguistic markers of LLM-generatedUzbek academic texts from stylometric and pragmatic perspectives. The relevance ofthe study is determined by the rapid spread of AI-based text generation in scholarlycommunication, the growing importance of academic integrity and authorshipattribution, and the lack of research on this issue in Uzbek as a low-resource language.The aim of the study is to identify and describe the lexica-grammatical, syntactic andpragmatic features that distinguish human-written academic discourse from textsgenerated by large language models. The material comprises a comparative corpus ofhuman-authored and LLM-generated texts on identical topics. The analysis employsstylometric methods (lexical diversity, mean sentence and word length, word frequencydistribution), discourse-pragmatic analysis (hedging, metadiscourse markers, modality,expression of authorial stance) and statistical testing. The findings reveal distinctivelinguistic “fingerprints” of LLM-generated texts, including stylistic uniformity, lexicalrepetition, calqued syntactic structures and pragmatic neutrality. The scientific noveltylies in the systematic description of linguistic markers of AI-generated texts in Uzbek.The results can be applied to authorship attribution, academic integrity policies, thedevelopment of automatic detection tools for Uzbek, and philological education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muradov Mukhammad (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: