Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accurate visualization of glioblastoma is essential for guiding biopsy, resection and radiotherapy. Contrast-enhanced MRI is routine in clinical practice, yet it can miss metabolically active tumor outside areas of blood-brain barrier disruption. In a histopathology-validated cohort with 472 tissue samples of 61 patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, we show that O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET ([ 18 F]FET PET) depicts tumor tissue significantly better than contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI), especially in regions that show no enhancement on MRI. [ 18 F]FET PET achieves substantially higher sensitivity for tumor detection (91.2% vs 52.6%) and maintains high reliability in non-enhancing tissue (positive predictive value 98.3%), findings that are consistent across newly diagnosed and recurrent disease and in both cohorts undergoing either resection or biopsy. These results indicate that [ 18 F]FET PET complements MRI by revealing MRI-occult tumor burden. Incorporating amino acid PET into routine planning may therefore improve the accuracy of tumor visualization and, ultimately, patient management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stürzl et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: