Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article examines the main principles, mechanisms, and outcomes of the state policy for the spatial and territorial development of Sevastopol in 1965-1985, focusing on housing and civil construction. The aim of the study is to reconstruct the development of housing construction in Sevastopol during this period. The article analyzes a wide range of sources that make it possible to present quantitative and qualitative indicators of the construction of housing and social and cultural facilities. The scientific novelty lies in providing a comprehensive historical analysis of housing construction in Sevastopol in 1965-1985. On this basis, the author develops a three-stage periodization of the sector’s development and identifies the technological and organizational features of the transition from large-block housing construction to industrial large-panel construction. In addition, a substantial body of archival materials is introduced into scholarly circulation, making it possible to identify systemic contradictions in the Soviet urban-planning model. The main result of the study is a periodization of housing construction in Sevastopol, which, based on empirical data, characterizes the specific features and qualitative and quantitative indicators of each stage. The findings demonstrate both the large-scale achievements of the Soviet model of mass construction and its systemic shortcomings and contradictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brazhnikov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: