Key result
Cardiopoietic stem cells improve LVEF by ~7 percentage points over standard care with safe delivery.
Why the study?
Cardiopoietic stem cell therapy improves left ventricular function and blunts pathological remodeling in pre-clinical heart failure models, motivating evaluation of its clinical feasibility, safety, and efficacy in patients with chronic heart failure.
Does autologous bone marrow-derived cardiopoietic stem cell therapy added to standard of care demonstrate feasibility, safety, and efficacy in patients with chronic ischemic heart failure?
RCT
Data acquisition and analysis were performed in blinded fashion
randomized
Yes
Does autologous bone marrow-derived cardiopoietic stem cell therapy added to standard of care demonstrate feasibility, safety, and efficacy in patients with chronic ischemic heart failure?
Lineage-specified cardiopoietic stem cell therapy via endomyocardial injection is feasible and safe in chronic ischemic heart failure, demonstrating significant improvements in LVEF, LV end-systolic volume, and 6-minute walk distance at 6 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Feasible and safe with preliminary efficacy signals in chronic HF; leaves open definitive benefit pending randomized confirmation.
Objectives This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of autologous bone marrow-derived and cardiogenically oriented mesenchymal stem cell therapy and to probe for signs of efficacy in patients with chronic heart failure. Background In pre-clinical heart failure models, cardiopoietic stem cell therapy improves left ventricular function and blunts pathological remodeling. Methods The C-CURE (Cardiopoietic stem Cell therapy in heart failURE) trial, a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial, was conducted in patients with heart failure of ischemic origin who received standard of care or standard of care plus lineage-specified stem cells. In the cell therapy arm, bone marrow was harvested and isolated mesenchymal stem cells were exposed to a cardiogenic cocktail. Derived cardiopoietic stem cells, meeting release criteria under Good Manufacturing Practice, were delivered by endomyocardial injections guided by left ventricular electromechanical mapping. Data acquisition and analysis were performed in blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was feasibility/safety at 2-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints included cardiac structure/function and measures of global clinical performance 6 months post-therapy. Results Mesenchymal stem cell cocktail-based priming was achieved for each patient with the dose attained in 75% and delivery without complications in 100% of cases. There was no evidence of increased cardiac or systemic toxicity induced by cardiopoietic cell therapy. Left ventricular ejection fraction was improved by cell therapy (from 27.5 ± 1.0% to 34.5 ± 1.1%) versus standard of care alone (from 27.8 ± 2.0% to 28.0 ± 1.8%, p < 0.0001) and was associated with a reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (-24.8 ± 3.0 ml vs. -8.8 ± 3.9 ml, p < 0.001). Cell therapy also improved the 6-min walk distance (+62 ± 18 m vs. -15 ± 20 m, p < 0.01) and provided a superior composite clinical score encompassing cardiac parameters in tandem with New York Heart Association functional class, quality of life, physical performance, hospitalization, and event-free survival. Conclusions The C-CURE trial implements the paradigm of lineage guidance in cell therapy. Cardiopoietic stem cell therapy was found feasible and safe with signs of benefit in chronic heart failure, meriting definitive clinical evaluation. (C-Cure Clinical Trial; NCT00810238).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartúnek et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure of ischemic origin. Autologous bone marrow-derived cardiopoietic stem cell therapy plus standard of care vs. Standard of care alone was evaluated on Feasibility and safety at 2-year follow-up. Cardiopoietic stem cell therapy achieved 100% complication-free delivery and improved LVEF from 27.5% to 34.5% vs 27.8% to 28.0% with standard care (p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: