Key result
Coronary artery calcium independently predicted obstructive CAD, whereas CCTA-reported severe stenosis at low calcium scores was confirmed by ICA in only 6.1%.
Why the study?
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) serves as a triage test before invasive coronary angiography (ICA), prompting evaluation of the agreement between the two methods when CCTA reports severe stenosis alongside a low coronary artery calcium (CAC) score.
Does coronary CT angiography and Agatston coronary artery calcium scoring accurately identify angiographically confirmed obstructive coronary artery disease on invasive coronary angiography, particularly in patients with reported severe stenosis on CCTA despite low calcium scores?
Cohort (n=124)
Yes
Does coronary CT angiography and Agatston coronary artery calcium scoring accurately identify angiographically confirmed obstructive coronary artery disease on invasive coronary angiography, particularly in patients with reported severe stenosis on CCTA despite low calcium scores?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients referred for invasive angiography due to severe stenosis reported on CCTA despite a low coronary calcium score, invasive angiography confirmed obstructive disease in only 6.1% of cases (and 0% when CAC <100 AU), suggesting substantial CCTA overestimation where non-invasive functional testing before catheterization may avoid unnecessary invasive procedures.
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is used as a triage test before invasive coronary angiography (ICA). In this study we assessed the level of agreement between the two methods in patients whose CCTA reported severe stenosis in the presence of a low coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. We retrospectively analyzed 124 patients selected from a total of 2,742 examinations who underwent both CCTA and ICA. A discordant group (n=33) had stenosis reported on CCTA together with a low CAC ( 400 and 100 AU). Across the whole cohort, obstructive disease (≥50% in the left main coronary artery or ≥70% in the other segments) was present in 44.4% of patients. In the discordant subgroup, agreement between CCTA and ICA was markedly worse: ICA showed obstructive disease in only 6.1% of patients. These results suggest that, although CAC remains a stand-alone predictor of obstructive disease, its predictive value is limited in a population already selected by referral for catheterization. The substantial discrepancy observed in cases where CCTA reports severe disease in the presence of a low CAC score raises the possibility that CCTA overestimates stenosis severity. In patients showing this pattern of discordance, non-invasive functional testing before referral to ICA could therefore be useful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bebeselea et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (n=124). Coronary artery calcium (Agatston) score (per unit increase in log10[CAC+1]) and discordant CCTA stenosis at low CAC vs. Invasive coronary angiography (reference standard) / lower Agatston score was evaluated on Angiographically confirmed obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD_70: ≥50% stenosis in the left main coronary artery or ≥70% in any major epicardial vessel or dominant side branch) (Adjusted OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.11-4.95, p=0.025). Coronary artery calcium independently predicted obstructive CAD, whereas CCTA-reported severe stenosis at low calcium scores was confirmed by ICA in only 6.1%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: