Key result
Nursing home cardiac arrest is linked to ~12.3-fold higher odds of an initial shockable rhythm vs home.
Why the study?
This study aimed to describe patient characteristics, bystander interventions, and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to arrest location, focusing on initial rhythm and automated external defibrillator use.
Does cardiac arrest location (nursing home versus home or other locations) affect the detection of an initial shockable rhythm in patients with medical-origin out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Cohort (n=2,478)
Does cardiac arrest location (nursing home versus home or other locations) affect the detection of an initial shockable rhythm in patients with medical-origin out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in nursing homes had significantly higher odds of presenting with an initial shockable rhythm compared to those at home or other locations, highlighting the role of prompt AED access in early rhythm detection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nursing home OHCA linked to higher shockable rhythm odds; extends observational data but leaves open implications for location-specific protocols.
Background We described the patient characteristics, bystander interventions, and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) according to arrest location, focusing on initial rhythm and automated external defibrillator (AED) use. Methods We analyzed medical-origin OHCAs from a population-based registry (2016–2024) by arrest location: home, nursing home, or other locations. Patient characteristics, bystander interventions, and outcomes were summarized descriptively. Multivariable logistic regression examined the association between arrest location and initial shockable rhythm. Results Among 2,478 OHCA cases, initial shockable rhythm was identified in 36.3% (221/609) in nursing homes, 7.1% (113/1,582) at home, and 33.4% (96/287) in other locations. After adjustment, the odds of an initial shockable rhythm were higher in nursing homes than at home (adjusted OR, 12.35; 95% CI, 8.93–17.24) and than in other locations (adjusted OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.60–3.45). In nursing homes, 97.0% (214/221) of patients with an initial shockable rhythm received an AED shock. One-month survival with favorable neurological outcomes was the lowest in nursing homes (0.8% [5/609]). Conclusions Initial shockable rhythm was identified in more than one-third of arrests occurring in nursing homes, and 97.0% of these patients received an AED shock. This finding may partly reflect earlier AED access, potentially increasing the likelihood of detecting a shockable rhythm soon after collapse. These findings underscore the importance of early rhythm detection through prompt AED use and suggest that extending AED access to home settings warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishiyama et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) (n=2,478). Cardiac arrest in a nursing home vs. Cardiac arrest at home was evaluated on Initial shockable rhythm (adjusted OR 12.35, 95% CI 8.93-17.24). Cardiac arrest in nursing homes was associated with higher odds of an initial shockable rhythm than at home.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: