Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Efficient CO 2 transport design is essential for early-stage carbon capture and storage (CCS) studies, yet detailed pipeline optimization is difficult to repeatedly embed in CCS chain assessments with varying CO 2 quality and economic assumptions. Conventional process optimization is based on comprehensive analysis through diameter-by-diameter hydraulic simulations and cost evaluations. In contrast, simple sizing rules do not usually capture the trade-off between pipeline investment and operating costs. This study develops an Economic Operating Band (ECOB)-based framework for rapid CO 2 pipeline sizing and transport cost screening. Full-process optimization shows that cost-optimal diameters cluster within a narrow band in erosional velocity ratio (EVR) space. The ECOB center is correlated with mass flow rate, electricity price, and steel cost, enabling single-step estimation of the optimal inner diameter. Validation against 166 internal out-of-sample full-process cases yielded median and P90 absolute diameter errors of 1.6% and 3.9%, respectively. Corresponding levelized-cost errors were 0.0% (median) and 4.9% (P90), with a maximum deviation of 22.6% in a stress-type case following discrete NPS selection. Literature-model comparisons showed transport cost deviations of 0.8–5.5%, while comparison with six existing CCS projects confirmed broadly consistent pipe-size estimates. Computational benchmarking further showed an approximately four-order-of-magnitude runtime reduction relative to exhaustive diameter-by-diameter evaluation. ECOB therefore provides a rapid and interpretable approach for preliminary pipeline sizing and cost screening, facilitating integration of CO 2 transport into broader CCS chain assessments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: