Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Imagine an AI that makes so many paperclips it consumes resources needed for human life. Its measure of success has displaced the purpose that made it valuable. This failure shares an optimization structure with Goodhart's law, which arose from human monetary policy. The connection turns the question toward civilization itself. Markets became powerful by responding to dispersed knowledge and changing reality. Yet financial success can increasingly depend on accumulating claims over future production rather than expanding human possibilities. We examine that hypothesis through financial claims, asset revaluation, and housing access. purpose: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Enterprises can preserve market discovery while organizing first to avoid harm, then to create human benefit, and finally to earn returns that sustain their work. Perhaps solving the paperclip problem for machines begins with solving it for ourselves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hugo M. Latapie (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: