Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The research work describes a unified battery management technique that involves a digital twin-based method that encompasses practically validated theory, data-oriented state evaluation, embedded management, and Internet of Things supervision. The task employs two connected phases of experimentation. The first phase consists in the analysis of a six-cell lithium-ion battery pack 3S2P 18650 in twelve operation modes, which consists of using both 0.5C, 1C, and 2C discharges under ambient temperatures of 25°C, 35°C, and 45°C with dynamic loading. The data obtained in the analysis of the voltage, current, temperature, capacity, and energy indicators will serve as calibration data for a second-order Thevenin equivalency circuit digital twin in MATLAB. Phase II benchmarks Random Forest, XGBoost, and LSTM models on 9,742 records from the NASA lithium-ion battery dataset and integrates the selected Random Forest model with an ESP32-based BMS prototype. The embedded platform combines dual INA219 current sensors, a 2-channel relay module, local LCD monitoring, MQTT communication, a Flask-SocketIO dashboard, and a staged voltage-protection strategy. The digital twin reproduces the measured voltage response with RMSE below 0.08 V and R² above 0.98 across the reported constant-current validation cases. In the AI benchmark, Random Forest reaches R² = 0.976, compared with 0.951 for XGBoost and 0.637 for LSTM. Feature-importance analysis identifies current and cycle count as the leading predictors of energy-loss behaviour. Live prototype measurements of 9.87 V, 39.4% SOC, and 100% SOH demonstrate end-to-end sensing, communication, decision, and protection operation. Together, the results establish a practical path from physically validated battery modelling to AI-assisted embedded BMS control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chavhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: