SAE Cooperation Theory Paper 5: One Side / SAE 合作论 Paper 5: 一端

This paper reads cooperation in which one end is headed in the 15DD direction and one leans toward 14DD. The cooperation this series reads has as its premise that at least one party is headed in the 15DD direction; cooperation in which one end is headed in this direction and the other leans toward 14DD is within scope, and is a proper object of this series. 15DD and 14DD here are stances, not labels for persons: they are read by the current relational condition, not by persons, and neither party is said to be lower. The end that leans toward 14DD and is within scope at least structurally acknowledges, in this undertaking, that the other has purposes of his own; being reduced to calculation is another matter. Such cooperation can be the setting in which cultivation happens, not the source of cultivation. Cultivation is not the general opening move of such cooperation; if the person himself chooses to make a cultivative intervention, and the relevant boundaries hold, the first step is helping the other stand more firmly on the things he himself cannot set down; the intervention cannot compress the other's authority, channels or practical possibility of refusing, interrupting, revising, exiting and restating himself. Cultivation is not instruction, not remaking; the completion of cultivation is not in the enactor's hands. The direction is read on that one effect, and whether it took hold is looked at separately, in the other party's later understanding and action; whether the other's capacity has increased is a measure of outcomes, and is not used to judge direction. The end headed in the 15DD direction can see more clues, and can discern whether the other is making use of him; clues are still only clues, and long-run relational fact can shift the weight of judgment but cannot complete a certification; whether to go on or to withdraw is his own judgment, on his own account. There is also a bias in the opposite direction: reading the other's strategic performance as awakening. Not being used, and not calculating in return: withdrawing one's own side is inward, is exit, and does not carry the direction of colonization, even if the other party's cost rises as a result; acting in a way directed at him that raises his cost is outward, and carries the direction of colonization. When, in this end's own fallible judgment, the other is in this undertaking reduced to calculation, this end from then on no longer does this undertaking as the cooperation this series reads; what this series reads is his judgment and his own side from then on, and it does not on that basis certify that the other is reduced to calculation; what this rests on is a condition of scope, not participation having come to nothing; the participation, facts and effects already there are entered as they stand; exit at the object layer goes separately by Paper 1. From then on, things are divided by the matters that actually remain: no longer doing this one thing together does not on that account become conflict; where it has become conflict and the reciprocal condition is currently unavailable, the unilateral path is read by the Conflict Treatise's safety check and stop gates; walking away takes no technical identity by itself, and leaving does not close out the shared matters that remain. This paper interfaces with the Analects' 以直报怨, repaying resentment with uprightness, and with Kant's "unsocial sociability." It does not prove that the party leaning toward 14DD is lower, does not prove that one ought to go and cultivate the other, does not prove that cultivation is bound to take hold, and does not prove that leaving is right. 这一篇读一端在 15DD 方向、一端偏 14DD 的合作。这个系列读的合作,以至少一方在 15DD 方向上为前提;一端在这个方向上、另一端偏 14DD 的合作在射程里,是这个系列的正对象。15DD、14DD 在这里是姿态,不是人的标签:按当前的关系条件读,不按人读,不说哪一方较低。偏 14DD 而在射程里的那一端,在这件事上至少结构地认下对方有他自己的目的;只剩算计,是另一件。 这样的合作可以是涵育发生的场合,不是涵育的来源。涵育不是一端合作的普遍起手;本人若选择作涵育性的介入,且相关边界守得住,第一步是帮对方更稳地站在他自己那些放不下的事上;干预不能压缩对方拒绝、中断、修订、退出与重新表述自己的权限、通道及现实可行性。涵育不是教化,不是改造;涵育的完成不在施为者手里。方向在那一次作用上读,成没成另看对方此后;对方的能力增加没有,是一把结果的尺,不拿它判方向。 在 15DD 方向上的那一端,看得见的线索更多,能分辨对方是否在利用自己;线索仍只是线索,长期的关系事实可以改变判断的权重,不能完成认证;继续还是收回,是他自己的判断,账在他自己。也有反向的偏误:把对方策略性的表演读成觉醒。不被利用,也不反过来算计:收回自己这一侧是向内,是退出,不带殖民方向,对方的成本因此上升也一样;冲着对方去抬高他的成本,是向外,带殖民方向。在这一端自己的可错判断里,对方在这件事上已只剩算计时,这一端此后不再按这个系列读的合作来做这件事;这个系列读的是他这一判与他此后这一侧,不据此认证对方只剩算计;凭的是射程的条件,不是参与落空;已有的参与、事实与作用照记;对象层上的退出另照第一篇。此后按实际仍在的事项分开:不再共同做这一件,不因此成了冲突;成了冲突、互向条件当前不可用的,照冲突论的安全检查与停止门读单向路;走开本身不取得技术身份,离开不结清仍在的共同的事。这一篇与《论语》的「以直报怨」、康德的「非社会的社会性」对接。这一篇不证明偏 14DD 的一方较低,不证明应当去涵育对方,不证明涵育一定成,也不证明离开就是对的。