Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We establish the exact conjugacy of Dirac operators on the boundary chain complexes of dual regular convex polytopes. For a dual pair (X, X*) in dimension n, we prove the existence of a permutation-with-signs Ψ: C(X*) → Cn−1−•(X) with Ψ DX* Ψ⁻¹ = D^X as an exact identity of integer matrices, and identify the obstruction to finding such a Ψ as a pure permutation as a cohomological invariant [Ψ] ∈ H¹(L(X); {±1}) on the face lattice of X. The main results are: (i) a duality lemma relating cellular duality to operator conjugation; (ii) a proof that [Ψ] = 0 for the infinite family {n-cube, n-cross}, n ≥ 2; (iii) explicit constructions and exact computational verifications for all dual pairs of regular polytopes in dimension n ≤ 4: the family {8-cell, 16-cell} (case n = 4), the pair {icosahedron, dodecahedron}, and the pair {600, 120} treated in the companion article [(Fernández Paniagua, Zenodo 2026, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.24040098)] (subsuming Theorem 10.2 of that work); (iv) an observed (G, det)-twisted equivariance of Ψ, verified by direct computation for the hyperoctahedral groups B_n (n = 2, 3, 4) and the icosahedral group H_3, and conjectured in general. All computations reported are exact integer identities, reproducible from the supplementary scripts. The note is purely algebraic and combinatorial and makes no physical claims.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonás Fernández Paniagua (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: