Key result
PR interval prolongation is evaluated as a predictor of ischemic stroke and major cardiovascular events.
Observational
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals the prognostic role of PR interval prolongation for ischemic stroke and cardiovascular outcomes in coronary patients, highlighting its predictive utility for vascular risk.
Table S1. Univariable and Multivariable Predictors for Carotid IMT. Table S2. Univariable and Multivariable Predictors for Cardiovascular Death. Table S3. Univariable and Multivariable Predictors for New-Onset Ischemic Stroke. Table S4. Univariable and Multivariable Predictors for New-Onset Myocardial Infarction. Table S5. Univariable and Multivariable Predictors for Combined Cardiovascular Endpoints of New-Onset Myocardial Infarction, Ischemic Stroke, Congestive Heart Failure and Cardiovascular Death. Table S6. Estimates of Sensitivity (Se), Specificity (Sp), Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of PR Interval in the Prediction for Cardiovascular Events. (DOC 444 kb)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease or risk equivalent. PR interval prolongation was evaluated on Ischemic stroke and combined cardiovascular endpoints (new-onset myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, congestive heart failure, and cardiovascular death). PR interval prolongation was evaluated as a predictor for carotid IMT, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death in coronary patients (supplementary file; no numbers stated).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: