Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Front-tracking methods simulate two-phase flows by using Lagrangian markers to explicitly track the interface between the phases, as well as a fixed Eulerian grid to resolve the flow field. Usually, the approach is combined with a one-field model of the flow field. This model uses a unique set of equations, blending the properties of the two phases in the interfacial region. This article proposes a numerical method that combines a front-tracking representation of the interface and a cut-cell discretisation of the flow field. By cutting the Eulerian grid to conform to the interface, the cut-cell discretisation can resolve the two phases separately with a two-field formalism. The present method uses a three-dimensional Cartesian staggered grid system and finite-volume schemes, which enforce strict local conservation of momentum, whereas a projection method imposes the divergence-free condition at the level of Cartesian cells. It is combined with a volume-preserving displacement of the Lagrangian mesh to ensure mass conservation. The numerical method is evaluated for a stationary spherical droplet, an oscillating droplet, a periodic array of bubbles, and a rising oblate bubble in planar zigzagging. The numerical method is stable and provides more accurate results than a baseline one-field/front-tracking method with similar spatial schemes, as the numerical method can explicitly impose accurate values of interfacial momentum transfers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dupuy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: