Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper investigates the doctrine of Maslahah in Islamic jurisprudence and its alignment with Maqasid al-Shariah, particularly in relation to challenges in modern finance, artificial intelligence, data protection, and bioethics. The core problem lies in demarcating genuine Shariah grounded welfare from commercial utility, especially when individual gains conflict with collective harm. By examining foundational texts, classical contributions by al-Ghazali, ‘Izz al-Din ibn ‘Abd al-Salam, al-Qarafi, al-Shatibi, and Ibn al-Qayyim, as well as resolutions from the International Islamic Fiqh Academy and international bodies, this study outlines practical criteria for resolving competing interests. It proposes a seven-step framework for evaluating new technologies and commercial instruments, arguing that Maslahah cannot serve as an open-ended justification for economic convenience without regard to legal precedent. The paper suggests that effective contemporary application requires institutionalized collective ijtihad, continuous cross-disciplinary input from domain experts, and systematic attention to eventual outcomes (Ma’alat al-Af‘al).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khaliq Ur Rehman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: