Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluating enterprise competitiveness in transition economies necessitates a balanced multi-criteria approach that accounts for industry-specific dynamics. This research proposes a standardized, reproducible methodology for assessing integral competitiveness using a panel of normalized financial and economic metrics. The model employs a block-weighted additive aggregation scheme across five core pillars: profitability, cost efficiency, liquidity, financial stability, and business activity. The methodology was empirically tested on two major industrial enterprises in Uzbekistan—AO “Farg’onaAzot” (chemical industry) and AO “Narimtex” (textile industry)—over a biennial panel spanning 2020 to 2024. The empirical findings reveal that while both enterprises experienced a parallel decline in overall competitiveness (with integral indices dropping from ~64 to ~32 points), their underlying competitive structures are fundamentally divergent. AO “Farg’onaAzot” derives its core strength from scale-driven profitability, whereas AO “Narimtex” maintains higher capital mobility and liquidity. The proposed framework demonstrates high analytical stability and serves as a strategic decision-support tool for industrial policy and corporate governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muzaffar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: