Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Manuscript prepared for the CEAS Space Journal (Springer), version 1.1.0, with supplementary information, title page and cover letter (docx and pdf). Revised after a pre-submission review: the performance targets are treated as hypothetical design targets; the thermochemical validation is harmonized at identical conditions; the energy buffers are stated with their units; the scope of the receiver mass and the heating of the hydrogen are discussed; the conventional tug with an optimized reactor is the primary benchmark; Sobol sensitivity, a technology-threshold map, node-phasing and independent-integration checks are added; the asteroid-deflection extension is in the Supplementary Information. Supersedes version 1.0.0. Abstract. Laser-assisted nuclear thermal propulsion (LANTP) would raise the specific impulse of a nuclear thermal tug by adding orbital laser power to the hydrogen. We take performance targets of this kind (specific impulse 1300–1500 s, thrust 50–120 kN, a 1–50 MW laser on a 100–500 MWt reactor, and an initial mass in low Earth orbit, IMLEO, 40% below that of conventional nuclear thermal propulsion, NTP) as hypothetical design targets and test them for Earth–Moon logistics with a coupled model: hydrogen thermochemistry checked against Cantera, a power chain from the wall plug to the propellant, Gaussian-beam capture, finite burns with occultation and link dropouts, tug and laser-node masses, and Monte Carlo and Sobol analyses over assumed ranges. Reaching 1300–1500 s needs a useful laser power of 2.2–3.6 times the reactor power, so a 1–50 MW laser gives at most 1,000 s, and 50–120 kN needs 0.7–1.6 GW of emitted power. Against a conventional tug whose reactor is sized for the payload, the laser-assisted tug has a median IMLEO ratio of 1.44 (5th–95th percentile 1.13–1.94); 0% of the draws are below 1 and none reaches 0.6. Receiver specific mass carries 73% of the variance. A technology-threshold map shows that a mass benefit needs a receiver below about 11 kg per MW absorbed. The laser nodes (about 18 kt) and the propellant reserve for a single laser fault remove the benefit. Results are conditional on the assumed ranges. Code and data: https://github.com/sandlerleon/lantp-cislunar-mc (archived at 10.5281/zenodo.24048703). All design inputs are assumed ranges, not measurements. A generative AI tool (Claude, Anthropic) assisted with drafting, code and figures; the author reviewed the content and takes full responsibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leon Sandler (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: