Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electronic voting can improve the accessibility and speed of election workflows, but remote voting introduces challenges involving voter impersonation, repeated voting, centralized record manipulation, limited voter-side confirmation, and the protection of sensitive identity data. This paper presents the design of an AI-enhanced blockchain voting platform that combines a Flutter mobile application with a Python backend, phone-number one-time-password (OTP) verification, device-mediated fingerprint authentication, facial verification with liveness checking, smart-contract-based vote validation, and a blockchain-backed audit record. The proposed workflow guides a voter through OTP verification, fingerprint approval, live facial verification, ballot submission, and receipt generation. During the voting session, the camera and recording service are intended to remain active; security, camera, authentication, or network failures terminate the session and return the user to login. The architecture separates the mobile interface, verification services, backend, application database, smart-contract layer, and ledger. We also identify design constraints that are essential for a credible voting system, particularly ballot secrecy, biometric-data minimization, secure off-chain storage, recording consent and retention, and the distinction between tamper-evident records and end-to-end election verifiability. This is a proposed system design; implementation results and performance measurements are not claimed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: