Key result
Proximal M2 thrombi show ~0.52 kPa lower stiffness than M1 occlusions.
Why the study?
Only 60% of patients with acute ischemic stroke achieve successful reperfusion after the first endovascular thrombectomy attempt, and in vitro studies showed that thrombus stiffness influences retrieval efficacy. The clinical, imaging, and histological correlates of thrombus stiffness and its association with first-pass reperfusion required prospective investigation.
Does intracranial occlusion location determine thrombus stiffness, and how does thrombus stiffness influence modified first-pass reperfusion during endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Observational (n=51)
No
Does intracranial occlusion location determine thrombus stiffness, and how does thrombus stiffness influence modified first-pass reperfusion during endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
This study demonstrates that intracranial occlusion location is the strongest clinical predictor of ex vivo thrombus stiffness—with distal M2 clots being significantly softer than proximal M1 and ICA clots—and that both extreme stiffness in the ICA and extreme softness in the M2 segment are associated with reduced first-pass thrombectomy success.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Occlusion site may guide EVT device trials; extends in vitro data but leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Introduction Only 60% of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) achieve successful reperfusion after the first endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) attempt. In vitro studies have shown that thrombus stiffness influences thrombus-device interaction and retrieval efficacy. This prospective observational study investigates how thrombus stiffness relates to clinical factors, thrombus imaging characteristics and histological composition. It further explores the association between thrombus stiffness and EVT success, as measured by the modified first-pass reperfusion (mFPR). Patients and methods A total of 281 thrombus samples were collected from 51 AIS patients undergoing EVT. Thrombus stiffness was quantified using compressive mechanical testing, composition from histological staining and radiological characteristics from pre-interventional non-contrast computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography. Statistical analysis was performed using linear and logistic mixed-effects regression models. Results Thrombi retrieved from the proximal M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery showed significant lower stiffness (0.236 kPa, 95% CI, 0.136–0.409) compared to those from the M1 segment (0.760 kPa, 95% CI, 0.492–1.174) and from the ICA (1.106 kPa, 95% CI, 0.558–2.192). Occlusion location was the strongest clinical marker of thrombus stiffness. Adjusted mFPR probability was 40.4% (95% CI, 24.5–67.0) for thrombi retrieved from the ICA, 89.7% (95% CI, 79.5–97.0) for M1 occlusions, and 53.0% (95% CI, 30.8–84.7) for M2 occlusions. Conclusion Thrombi in distal vessels of the anterior cerebral circulation are significantly softer than those in proximal intracranial arteries. First-pass EVT success is lower for the stiffest thrombi from the ICA and for the softest thrombi from M2, providing a foundation for future biomechanically informed thrombus removal strategies to optimise AIS treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bontempi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (n=51). Proximal M2 occlusion site and thrombus stiffness vs. M1 and ICA occlusion sites was evaluated on Thrombus stiffness (kPa) and modified first-pass reperfusion (mFPR, defined as eTICI score >=2b after the first EVT attempt) (MD -0.524 kPa (M2 vs M1), 95% CI -1.024 to -0.093). Proximal M2 thrombi had lower stiffness (0.236 kPa) than M1 (0.760 kPa) and ICA (1.106 kPa), with lower mFPR in ICA (40.4%) and M2 (53.0%) vs M1 (89.7%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: