This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Tonic pupil size is a non-invasive, indirect index of arousal that partly reflects locus coeruleus–noradrenergic activity but is also influenced by autonomic, cholinergic, serotonergic, cognitive and emotional factors. We tested whether ultra-low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ULFTENS) of the dorsal anterior tongue mucosa, delivered through an intraoral stimulation electrode (tongue ULFTENS electrode, TUD), modifies tonic pupil size in the dark. Methods: In this randomized controlled pilot trial, healthy women aged 20–30 years were randomized 1:1 to TUD stimulation or to a no-stimulation control condition (CTRL). Binocular pupil size was recorded by infrared pupillometry in darkness for 15 s at baseline (T0) and at two subsequent time points 5 min apart (T1, corresponding to the stimulation period in the TUD group; T2, after stimulation). The primary outcome was the change in pupil size from baseline to T1 (T1 − T0), analyzed by ANCOVA adjusted for baseline; the Group × Time effect was tested with a mixed-design ANOVA. Effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported for all comparisons. Results: Out of 54 randomized participants, 48 were analyzed (TUD, n = 21; CTRL, n = 27). A significant Group × Time interaction was found (F(1.84, 84.6) = 5.73, p = 0.006, η2p = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01–0.23). Pupil size increased over time in the CTRL group (T1 − T0: +295 pixels, 95% CI 79 to 512) and decreased in the TUD group (−397 pixels, 95% CI −743 to −50). At T1 (stimulation period of the TUD; no intervention in CTRL), the baseline-adjusted between-group difference was −689 pixels (95% CI −1059 to −319; p < 0.001; d = −1.06, 95% CI −1.67 to −0.45, large effect), about 10% of baseline pupil size. After stimulation, the difference was attenuated (−398 pixels, 95% CI −782 to −14; p = 0.043; d = −0.61, 95% CI −1.19 to −0.03, medium effect). No adverse events occurred. Conclusions: In young healthy women, ULFTENS of the dorsal anterior tongue mucosa was associated with the absence of the progressive increase in tonic pupil size observed in the dark in controls, with a large effect during stimulation and an attenuated post-stimulatory effect on pupillary tone. Because the control group received neither a sham device nor stimulation, effects of the device, oral sensory input and expectation cannot be excluded. Whether this reflects a reduction in noradrenergic arousal requires confirmation in sham-controlled studies with concurrent physiological measures. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06790459 (24 January 2025).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolantonio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: